Services

Our Services

Paid Media

Drive qualified demand with paid campaigns

Paid Search

Capture high-intent buyers through search

Paid Social

Turn social ads into pipeline growth

Reddit Advertising

Reddit Advertising for B2B SaaS

SaaS Marketing

Scale B2B SaaS growth with full-funnel strategy

Creative & Content

Craft visuals and content that convert

Web Design & CRO

Design optimize to drive revenue

All Services Overview
Success StoriesPricing
About
About Us

Who we are and how we work

Our Team

The people behind the work

Careers

Join the T.A. Monroe team

FAQ

Common questions answered

Contact Us

No pressure, commitment free

Resources
Resource Hub

All resources in one place

Podcast

The Revenue Engine Podcast

Free Resources

Free growth hacks

Contact Us
Book a Call
Book a Call
All resources
Podcast
15
min read

What Is the Difference Between an MQL and an SQL? With Alex Tinsley of SUSE

October 17, 2025

Table of Contents

>
Heading
>
Heading
>
Heading
>
Heading
>
Heading

SUSE field marketing director Alex Tinsley on the handoff where B2B pipeline actually breaks, and why two companies with identical traffic can convert qualified leads at twice the rate.

What is the difference between an MQL and an SQL?

An MQL has met marketing’s bar: the right kind of company, the right role, and enough engagement to suggest interest. An SQL has met sales’ bar: real need, a timeline, and access to whoever signs. The two teams disagree when nobody wrote down where one ends and the other begins.

What You Will Take Away

“That’s the same thing in marketing and sales. If there’s no good handoff, if there’s no good transition of ownership of the next step or what their steps are, or what their path or process is, then success cannot be had.”

The definition is worth about double. B2B SaaS companies convert MQLs to sales-qualified at 18% to 22% on average. Companies using behavioral fit scoring rather than engagement alone run at 39% to 40%: same product and traffic, different boundary.

Both teams are right about their own numbers. Marketing reports on a bar it set and sales reports on a different one. Neither dashboard is wrong, and neither settles anything, because they are counting different populations.

Where the lead came from predicts whether it converts. Organic search converts to sales-qualified at around 51%. Paid social runs at 10% to 18%. Before you change the definition, look at whether the source mix moved.

Misalignment is assumption, not malice. Alex Tinsley’s central point on this episode: sales assumes marketing runs events, marketing assumes sales ignores leads, and both are describing a colleague they have never sat with. Cross-training fixes more than a new scoring model does.

A handoff nobody owns is a handoff that does not happen. The single most common gap is not a bad definition. It is a definition with no named owner on either side and no agreed response time.

Listen on SpotifyListen On Apple PodcastsListen on Amazon MusicListen on TuneInListen on PandoraListen on Deezer

What This Episode Covers

Timestamp Topic
03:31 What changes when the silo between sales and marketing comes down
06:38 The myth each team believes about the other
11:02 Where revenue operations should report, and why it matters
14:47 Segmentation that ignores the standard B2B account model
25:11 Why vendors get channel-driven revenue wrong
30:16 The biggest pain points for B2B SaaS marketing leaders, as of 2025
34:44 Learning the stack you have before buying another tool
37:16 The leadership lesson that changed how he decides

MQL vs SQL: What Actually Separates Them

Both terms describe a lead somebody has decided is worth pursuing. The difference is who decided, on what evidence, and what happens next.

Marketing qualified lead Sales qualified lead
Who qualifies it Marketing, usually by scoring model Sales, usually by conversation
What it proves Fit plus interest Fit plus interest plus intent to act
Typical evidence Firmographic match, role match, repeated engagement with buying-stage content A stated problem, a timeline, budget visibility, access to a decision maker
What it does not prove That anyone is planning to buy anything That the deal will close
Owned by Demand generation Sales development or the account executive
The failure mode Scoring engagement without fit, so activity looks like intent Rejecting leads without recording why, so marketing never learns
The question to ask Would sales take this meeting if they saw the record before the score? Could we lose this deal to “no decision” rather than to a competitor?

The row that matters most is the last one on each side. A qualification model that nobody can fail is a reporting exercise. If marketing has never had an MQL rejected and sales has never had a rejection questioned, the boundary is not being used; it is being decorated.

What MQL to SQL Conversion Should Look Like

If your rate is well below these, the usual cause is a definition that scores engagement without fit. If it is well above, check that marketing is not simply passing fewer, later-stage leads and calling it quality.

By performance band

Band MQL to sales qualified
Cross-industry average, all sectors ~13%
B2B SaaS average 18% to 22%
Top performers 25% to 35%
Using behavioral and firmographic fit scoring 39% to 40%

By channel

Channel MQL to sales qualified
Organic search ~51%
Email nurture ~46%
Google Ads, brand 30% to 40%
Referrals ~25%
LinkedIn Ads 18% to 28%
Google Ads, non-brand 15% to 26%
Webinars and events 17% to 24%
Paid social 10% to 18%

By deal size

Segment MQL to sales qualified Typical sales cycle
Product-led 25% to 40% 7 to 30 days
SMB, $5K to $15K ACV 20% to 28% 30 to 60 days
Mid-market, $15K to $75K ACV 15% to 22% 60 to 120 days
Enterprise, $75K to $500K ACV 10% to 18% 120 days and up

Where these figures come from

Figures are from a published April 2026 analysis of B2B SaaS conversion benchmarks, drawing on proprietary agency data and a First Page Sage client analysis covering 2019 to 2025. The publisher does not state a sample size, so treat these as directional. The organic search figure is independently corroborated by a second 2026 benchmark set. The useful comparison is your rate against your own rate last quarter, computed the same way, and one channel against another inside your own funnel.

A Worked Example: The Handoff Agreement

This is a practical example, not research. It is one page, it takes an hour with both teams in the room, and it is the cheapest fix available for the problem this episode is about. Fill in every row. The rows nobody can answer are the reason the argument keeps happening.

Row What goes in it
An MQL is The firmographic bar, the role bar, and the engagement bar. All three, written as tests a person could apply by hand
An SQL is What sales adds on top. Usually a stated problem, a timeline, and access to a decision maker
Response time How long sales has to work an MQL before it returns to nurture. Name the number
Rejection reasons A closed list. Not a free text box, because a free text box produces no learning
Who owns the boundary One name from marketing, one from sales. Not two teams, two people
Review cadence When the two of them sit down and look at rejections together. Monthly is usually right
What triggers a rewrite A conversion rate moving more than a few points, an ICP change, or a new segment. Agree it in advance so the rewrite is not a negotiation

Why this works when a scoring model does not. A scoring model is marketing’s answer to sales’ complaint. An agreement is both teams’ answer to a shared problem, and the difference shows up in the rejection reasons: once sales has to pick from a list they helped write, “bad leads” stops being an available answer and something specific takes its place.

The fit half of the same definition, with Recurly’s former CRO: How do you define an ideal customer profile for B2B SaaS?

How To Apply This

  1. Foster consistent communication between sales and marketing: Encouraging regular meetings and shared planning sessions helps both teams understand each other’s goals, challenges, and language, thereby reducing friction and building alignment.
  2. Define shared revenue goals and metrics: When both departments are measured by the same success indicators, it promotes collaboration and eliminates the “us versus them” mentality that hinders progress.
  3. Create a clear handoff process for leads: Establishing defined ownership at every stage of the buyer journey ensures accountability, minimizes lost opportunities, and improves conversion rates.
  4. Use data to guide decisions, not assumptions: Relying on shared dashboards and analytics empowers both teams to focus on what truly drives results, removing subjective opinions from strategy discussions.
  5. Invest in cross-training and shadowing programs: Allowing sales to experience marketing workflows, and vice versa, builds empathy, enhances collaboration, and strengthens the overall revenue engine.
  6. Audit your rejected MQLs before you change the scoring: Pull the last fifty leads sales sent back and read the reasons. If the reasons are missing or all say the same thing, the problem is the rejection process, not the scoring model, and changing the model will not fix it.

Got the definition right and the quality still is not there?

Free resource

MQL Quality Cheat Sheet

The agreement above fixes the boundary. Our MQL Quality Cheat Sheet covers what to do when the boundary is right and the leads still are not converting: the scoring inputs to change, in the order that usually moves the number fastest.
Download Now

In this episode…

Bridging the divide between sales and marketing remains one of the toughest challenges in B2B organizations. Too often, these two departments operate in silos: each chasing different goals, using different metrics, and misunderstanding what truly drives the other. But what if aligning them could unlock faster revenue growth, deeper trust, and a more predictable sales pipeline?

According to Alex Tinsley, a marketing leader with deep experience across sales, operations, and field marketing, the key lies in empathy and shared understanding. He highlights that misalignment often stems from false assumptions: sales thinking marketing just plans events, and marketing assuming sales ignores their leads. Alex emphasizes that when both teams take the time to learn each other’s motivations and constraints, they realize they’re chasing the same outcome: revenue.

In this episode of the Revenue Engine Podcast, host Alex Gluz speaks with Alex Tinsley, Director of North America Field Marketing at SUSE, to discuss how uniting sales and marketing can supercharge B2B revenue. They explore the impact of removing internal silos, improving the sales-to-marketing handoff, and aligning goals around shared outcomes. Alex also shares how empathy, structure, and data transparency build trust that drives long-term growth.

Quotable Moments

  • “All in all, we’re all working for the same goal. We just didn’t know it or we didn’t talk about it.”
  • “The only goal is the end goal, which is revenue. That’s the only goal.”
  • “If you’re so successful with your core customers and you get all the basics and you execute excellently, scale will organically happen.”
  • “You don’t have to always make the right decision because you never know what the right decision is at any given moment. But when you make a decision, no matter what, make that decision right.”
  • “If your marketers don’t understand how the tech stack works, then how are they going to use that tech stack to optimize the output for their input?”
Episode transcript

Introduction and Alex Tinsley’s background

Alex Gluz: Hey, Alex, nice to have you here.

Alex Tinsley: Hi, how are you?

Alex Gluz: I’m doing well. Can you do a brief intro of who you are and what you do?

Alex Tinsley: Alex Tinsley. I’m the director of North America Field Marketing at SUSE. We are the revenue-generating marketing arm of SUSE for North America.

Alex Tinsley: What that means is our direct partner is sales. We map directly to sales. We work with sales to get opportunities developed for them, and then we work with them to support, surround every effort to help that opportunity change to bookings, to revenue.

Alex Gluz: That’s great. I’m really looking forward to this conversation. I just literally had a conversation within my team and one of our clients how the sales and marketing team is disconnected. Always a hot topic.

Alex Gluz: Looking forward to this, but let’s take a step back. How did you get started? What did you go to school for?

Alex Tinsley: That’s interesting. I went to school to be a lawyer and quickly changed to business after I took one business class. I saw that it was an opportunity for me to shine, as I’m so curious on how the world works.

Alex Tinsley: Business is a great amalgamation of people and economics and every aspect of every human, at least here in the United States of America. We wake up thinking about money and we go to bed thinking about money, as the joke goes.

Alex Gluz: What were some of your first jobs after college?

Alex Tinsley: I worked in restaurants. I worked as a bartender. I was in construction, and I moved up within those organizations into management and learning about the business.

Alex Tinsley: Then someone said, “You should go into sales. By the way, software sales is where you make the most money.”

Alex Tinsley: I started looking for jobs and quickly found a job in the Washington, D.C. area. I fell in love with the sales operation and mindset and all the aspects of it.

Moving from sales into marketing

Alex Gluz: What brought you to marketing, back from the sales side?

Alex Tinsley: Sales was exciting. It had its ups and downs of making money, not making money, and going through each of the cycles, the quarters, the renewals, and meeting people and trying to get new business. Those are all exciting.

Alex Tinsley: Then, in the times that it was a little slow, I would go talk with marketing. Be like, “Hey, you’re not delivering.”

Alex Tinsley: Then I’d come back and my peers would say, “They never deliver. They don’t do anything. I don’t know what they do over there. All they do is events and they give out tchotchkes or gifts or whatever.”

Alex Tinsley: Sales teams complained about marketing; marketing complained about sales teams. I’m of the personality that I don’t like anything to repeat a few times. I don’t even watch reruns of TV shows. I don’t watch movies more than once, usually. It bores me.

Alex Tinsley: I went over to the marketing side and I sat down with them and I said, “Look, this is silly. You guys are complaining about us, we’re complaining about you. It’s that whole us versus you versus us. Can you all walk me through what it is you do? I just want to see what you do on a daily basis.”

Alex Tinsley: “I want to know if I can help. I want to help change the perception. I want to help you better. I want to learn something to help me better. I want to also change the perception of sales for you.”

Alex Tinsley: I just sat there and learned and tried to understand everything. I shared with them what the salespeople go through. Then we worked together for a little while, a little more closely, on how we could pass leads better with the information, feedback loop, those kinds of things.

Alex Tinsley: Eventually they asked me to be on a special committee for internal marketing purposes. I said, “Okay, I’ll do it. Let’s make this happen.”

Alex Tinsley: After a while, sales, yes, it was very nice, but marketing started to intrigue me much more. I ended up making the switch. I wanted to be more of the change that I saw happening. I took that on as a sense of pride for me.

Alex Tinsley: My mission is to make marketing and sales work together more effectively to both outcomes. Sales individuals want more money booked, more deals booked so they can have more money. Ultimately, the company needs more money.

Alex Tinsley: Usually marketing gets paid a bonus of some sort because of the company’s performance. All in all, we’re all working for the same goal. We just didn’t know it or we didn’t talk about it.

Aligning sales and marketing around revenue

Alex Gluz: So true. Being involved on both sides and now being on the operational side too, what do you think is one thing both teams still get wrong about each other?

Alex Tinsley: It’s just the perceptions. It’s the same thing that I was going through.

Alex Tinsley: When one doesn’t take time to understand what motivates the other and what gets in the other person’s way, whether it’s in a job or in life in general, they create their own story about the other person.

Alex Tinsley: In sales, if they aren’t working closely with the marketing person that is assigned to them or within their region, then you make up a story about what they do because you don’t see them. They must not do much. And the marketing person as well. It still happens all the time.

Alex Tinsley: It’s a boring process because everybody knows you’ve got to seek to understand and be curious, and you’re partners in this. You can’t do one without the other. Why not just ask, “What do you do? How do you do what you do?”

Alex Tinsley: I think that’s what they get wrong. It’s the age-old story of just ask.

Alex Gluz: This is such a common theme in the industry at the moment.

Alex Gluz: From what I heard from marketing leaders over the years, marketing and sales often just don’t understand each other’s realities. Sales teams are chasing immediate revenue, while marketing teams are trying to create long-term strategies where the payoff is not clear.

Alex Gluz: It seems the main issue is that both teams need to be aligned, but often they are on different pages about what the goal even is. I think it’s about focusing on the common ground.

Alex Gluz: Like you mentioned, sales should give marketing insights into what type of leads actually close, and marketing should ensure they are delivering the leads and prospects that fit the sales team strategy.

Alex Gluz: Getting both teams on the same page isn’t easy. But when it happens, they can transform how they work together and drive results for the organization.

Alex Tinsley: Absolutely. But that does start with conversations at the individual level, trying to understand what each other does. The only goal is the end goal, which is revenue. That’s the only goal.

Alex Gluz: Right. That’s the high-level conversation, and it’s always important to have the bigger goal in mind. It’s offense and defense and special teams, but it’s all about winning.

Alex Tinsley: It is all about winning.

Alex Gluz: It’s all about winning. It’s only W. When you look at the records, you look at the W. Sorry, we go into football seasons.

Alex Tinsley: That’s great. That’s absolutely right.

Alex Tinsley: The interesting thing is, though, sales and marketing and the peripheral around those two specific roles tend to forget that they each have the same goal. They have a perception of how to get to that goal, and they may be different, but when they can align, that’s where the magic happens.

Alex Tinsley: Like you’re talking about, that’s where the magic happens. You remind each other what the goal is, and then each of you has your own job. Let them do their jobs.

Alex Tinsley: If you want to go back to football, the quarterback has their job. The quarterback either throws the ball, hands the ball off or runs the ball. There are three major scenarios that the quarterback does.

Alex Tinsley: If there is no one to receive the ball or take the ball or stop other people from stopping the quarterback from running, then the quarterback doesn’t matter. If the ball is not coming to the wide receiver, it doesn’t matter. If the ball isn’t handed off to the running back, then the running back doesn’t matter.

Alex Tinsley: They have small parts and they do their thing, but nobody remembers what they did because the ball didn’t go to them.

Alex Gluz: Right.

Alex Tinsley: That’s the same thing in marketing and sales. If there’s no good handoff, if there’s no good transition of ownership of the next step or what their steps are, or what their path or process is, then success cannot be had.

Where revenue operations should report

Alex Gluz: You also do revenue operations. This question comes often: should RevOps report to marketing, sales or the CEO, the executive suite? Why do most companies get this wrong?

Alex Tinsley: I’ll start with the last question first. I think most companies get it wrong because of ego. I think most companies get it wrong because of the way they’ve structured themselves, because of the leader’s ego, because of, “This is how we’ve done it. I need to own this because of these reasons. This needs to be here because the budget’s here. This needs to be here because of whatever reporting structure had been decided.”

Alex Tinsley: But the fact is, if you put revenue operations under the CEO, then the CEO only cares about revenue, or the CEO doesn’t care about revenue and doesn’t give revenue operations the proper attention and the proper partnership.

Alex Tinsley: The CEO must care about many more things than just revenue. Revenue is an outcome from all the things the CEO must do.

Alex Tinsley: But revenue operations should only care about how we get revenue the fastest, most efficient and effective. How much does it cost us to get $1 of revenue? How can we get that to the cheapest way possible? How can we get our people the most productive as possible?

Alex Tinsley: We’ve got 50 AEs and we need to make a million dollars. Each of those 50 AEs needs to bring in $20,000. If they bring in 17, you fail. If you bring in 22, great. That’s all they should care about.

Alex Tinsley: When revenue operations reports to the CEO, it makes it a big challenge to the CEO to give the revenue operations team the proper attention. And the opposite: if revenue operations is getting the proper attention that they deserve and need, then the CEO is spending too much time with revenue operations.

Alex Tinsley: Revenue operations should not sit with marketing either. A lot of what marketing does is to ensure that there’s a tangible future, and consistently delivering a tangible future and creating opportunities in the future.

Alex Tinsley: Revenue operations doesn’t work in the future. They help people prepare for the future with intelligent data to make decisions on hiring, any exiting that needs to happen, growth within teams. How are they going to expend if they need to spend or invest in certain areas? Can we afford it? And many other things.

Alex Tinsley: Revenue operations is most in the now and the near now, not the long-term future. They help inform the long-term future strategy.

Alex Tinsley: Revenue operations, at least in my experience, in my mind, the best organizations, the most productive, the highest growth and most successful organizations that I’ve seen, read about and have been a part of, report into the CRO, the chief revenue officer, the sales leader.

Alex Tinsley: I fully believe that is where they should stay and that’s where they should be. But also, the CRO should have field marketing. That’s where I sit. I report into the CRO. Revenue operations reports into the CRO, and all the GMs around report into the CRO.

Account clustering and customer segmentation

Alex Gluz: That makes a lot of sense. When we talked a little bit before the interview, you mentioned working on account clustering and segmentation. What’s your view on account segmentation that goes against traditional B2B methods?

Alex Tinsley: It really depends on the size of your organization, the type of product or services that you sell and where your market is.

Alex Tinsley: The companies that I’ve worked for in the last 15 years in sales or marketing have been software, enterprise software to be specific, and most of the last 10 years has been with open-source software. It’s a very niche of a very small industry, of a very powerful industry, but small comparative to the rest of the industries that people work in.

Alex Tinsley: When we take a look at clustering and segmentation, we’ll take a look at North America, for example. A lot of companies focus on the mid-market. There’s a lot of revenue to be had in the mid-market.

Alex Tinsley: If you define the mid-market, it can be anywhere from a hundred million to a billion. It could be anywhere from 250 million to a billion and a half. I’ve seen it a bunch of different ways, defined by different companies, defined by different agencies around the globe.

Alex Tinsley: It could be by employee size of maybe 5,000 to 10,000. Whatever you want to look at, it’s roughly 35,000 to 50,000 companies in the U.S. alone, just the United States.

Alex Tinsley: However, there are also 500 companies, the Fortune 500 companies. Those Fortune 500 companies deliver two-thirds of the United States of America’s GDP. Two-thirds. Five hundred companies or 40,000.

Alex Tinsley: You could look at both of those markets, and I’ll leave all the small and medium businesses out for just a second because I think this number is big enough to think about. You have over 40,000 companies to go after, with less than 1% delivering two-thirds of the GDP of America.

Alex Tinsley: Depending on your business and what your core tenets of channel of delivery or products or services, you want to take a look at all of this. You can either go after all 40,000, 50,000 companies, which is a lot to chew. Where do you get started? You’ve got to start with one.

Alex Tinsley: Or if you have a sales team of 50 and they each have a hundred accounts, it’s 5,000 accounts they’ve got to go after. You’re still only scratching the surface. You’re looking at 12.5%.

Alex Tinsley: The point being is you’ve got to figure out a way to attack all of the business that could be had wherever your market is. If you have particular solutions that are better suited or have core use cases in particular industries, you might want to start there and not try to serve all of it.

Alex Tinsley: It’s really impressive how some companies get started, like some of the new tech wearables for sports. We’ll go on a different sports theme for a second.

Alex Tinsley: When a couple of these companies got set out, they wanted to get very specific with highly successful athletes to make sure that their data and their products are really good for successful athletes, like professional athletes. They started with that market.

Alex Tinsley: They figured if they could get that right, then they could show the value to the high-performing amateurs and then the high-conscientious mid-range amateurs like myself. I want to be better than I am, but I can only be as good as I can. The data helps me achieve that potential.

Alex Tinsley: They started with their core, with a tight cluster to get everything right. The great news is, and I had this conversation yesterday, this is so amazing: what you do with clustering and segmentation, if you get it right for a particular cluster, scale will come organically. You cannot hold scale back.

Alex Tinsley: If you’re so successful with your core customers and you get all the basics and you execute excellently, scale will organically happen because other companies and other people will be coming at you, trying to get what the competitors have and what others want and what others have.

Alex Tinsley: The problem with it is, if you don’t execute excellently and stay to the basics and deliver to a core set of customers, then how can you scale without understanding what you’re doing really good first?

Alex Tinsley: As soon as you start to scale without understanding and getting everything right, or as close to right as possible, your vulnerabilities will get larger and things will start to fall apart quicker. It will be much more difficult to fix.

Alex Tinsley: That’s why clustering, account segmentation around what your core tenets of business are and your core deliverables, no matter what industry you’re in, particularly in software.

Alex Tinsley: If you spend a bunch of money on enterprise software and you fail, that’s someone’s career at that company. What do you think they’re going to do and what do you think they’re going to say? Not good.

Alex Tinsley: But if you get it right with Amex, for example, or you get it right with an even smaller company, maybe there’s a construction company that I know about called H.G. Reynolds. You get it right there, then you can go to another construction company, and then you can go to a construction company supplier like Home Depot or Lowe’s.

Alex Tinsley: You can start scaling out because you have these core wins. That’s clustering and segmentation. A lot of it goes against the traditional.

Alex Tinsley: When I first got here and when I got to other companies, they’re like, “We need bookings, we need revenue, we need customers. We’ve got to go, go, go.”

Alex Tinsley: A lot of teams are set up to just hunt and go and get business and then hopefully renew. Then they don’t renew, so they’ve got to go get more business and more business.

Alex Tinsley: But if you cluster things, you can ensure net-new business and renewals from the customers that you have. They trust you and you can just keep building out from there. Scale won’t be a problem because it’ll happen organically. It’ll be forced upon you.

Alex Gluz: What you said is amazing, and there’s so much to unpack here. Have you ever read Crossing the Chasm or heard about Crossing the Chasm? That’s the book, and it’s from the nineties. That’s exactly what they talked about.

Alex Gluz: Clustering and really going after the segments, and making sure the segment you go after, you’re really successful at that segment before going to the next. That’s where the organic growth comes, versus trying to go super broad.

Alex Gluz: Traditional B2B segmentation often focuses on broad categories like company revenue, size or industry. But it’s not effective in 2025. What I believe in is segmenting by real customer needs, behavioral signals.

Alex Gluz: It’s not enough to say we’re going after companies with a certain number of employees, a certain number of revenue or industry. That doesn’t tell you anything about why they need your solution and they need this now.

Alex Gluz: Instead, we should be segmenting based on pain points, intent signals and readiness to buy. Some smaller companies may need enterprise-level solutions, and some larger companies may be looking for something more nimble.

Alex Gluz: Segmentation needs to be about understanding the buyer’s journey, not just who they are. Focus on real problems they’re trying to solve and segment based on that, making sure you’re targeting the right account with the right message.

Matching resources to intent signals and markets

Alex Tinsley: Absolutely. And you apply the right resources to those.

Alex Tinsley: I would even go a step further and say, even within your addressable market, within the cluster of accounts, within the intent signals that you have, you need to understand how many intent signals are going to be the ones where you put your most expensive resources, which are your people. Then you need to work out from there.

Alex Tinsley: Say you put three criteria on there, and you put your very expensive people resources and maybe a little bit of money resources.

Alex Tinsley: Then, when you go out one ring and they may hit two out of three of your critical measures of how you want to go after the market, you can apply a little bit more marketing resources, a little bit more money resources and a little bit less expensive people.

Alex Tinsley: Then one out of three categories. You can keep it going and make sure all those signals are coming, just at different speeds and with different resources, so that you can make sure that you maximize the resources that you apply to your clustering, the way that you use intent signals and the way that you apply the right message to the right account.

Alex Gluz: Totally. That’s also one of my favorite subjects, really the resourcing and making sure you put the right resources at the right time.

Alex Gluz: One of the great examples, and it’s easy to understand. Let’s say they’ve been in the United States and they want to go outside of it. They’re like, “We’re going to go to South America, the Latin market.”

Alex Gluz: But it’s not enough to just translate things. You need to understand the culture. You need to put the right resources so it all makes sense.

Alex Gluz: Then you go and you’re like, “It’s not working.” But you didn’t put the right resources for this to work. The resourcing, you’re so spot on, Alex.

Alex Gluz: It’s definitely a big part of it, making sure you do provide the right support and give it the right time too.

Alex Gluz: You don’t want to spread too thin. That’s another thing.

Alex Tinsley: That’s right.

Building trust with channel partners

Alex Gluz: You worked at both software resellers and vendors. What’s the biggest mistake vendors make when building revenue engines that rely on channel partners?

Alex Tinsley: We’re going through this right now, and it is dear to my work heart, if I could say that.

Alex Tinsley: The reason why is because the easiest thing to do is to partner and let someone else do work to help you scale. It seems like a no-brainer, but vendors get in their own way.

Alex Tinsley: There are some vendors who get it right. Most famously, Microsoft gets it right. Let’s forget about what they do and how they treat their people and their employees and all that stuff. However, what they do get right is they have a partner-first model. They have an ecosystem that is phenomenally built.

Alex Tinsley: Again, I can’t talk about how they treat it, but the ecosystem: they build products and services that are missing parts, and the way they tier their ecosystem is how those partners in that ecosystem fill in the gaps for the customer.

Alex Tinsley: That is amazing because that’s a true partnership that says, “We trust you enough that we’re going to give you 90. I’m making the number up for a second. We’ll give you 90 of what you need to be successful in the sale, but we need you to finish it for the customer and build the relationship with the customer so that it delivers and satisfies them.”

Alex Tinsley: They look at the vendor going, “Great product, and I’ve got great people to work with in our ecosystem.”

Alex Tinsley: The reason why I start off with that is because that’s a very positive look at it. I know that it is very complicated, and it’s not always roses and everything like that. But the partnership works because in the premise is automatic trust.

Alex Tinsley: The issue with a lot of companies, and the company that we’re trying to work through and a couple of previous companies, they started as direct selling to customers. B2C, they started direct selling and then they added in partners.

Alex Tinsley: The issue with that is, sales, and it’s a good thing, they’re very, “What about me?” It is viewed as, “They’re cutting into my margin. They’re cutting into my paycheck. They’re cutting into the deals. They’re going to cost me money if I work with them.”

Alex Tinsley: The more successful salespeople, at least in the software industry that I’m in and with the ecosystem, are the ones that leverage the partner ecosystem to scale their business and grow their business.

Alex Tinsley: It’s not always on the shoulders of the salesperson, and you can use the machine to help you print money. They’ve got more people. They’ve got more reach. They’ve got more contacts.

Alex Tinsley: Giving up a little margin here and there and getting more and larger deals actually is getting more money in your pocket.

Alex Tinsley: The reason why I’m bringing up all this, and I know it’s an oversimplification of it, but the perception of the partner ecosystem is what a lot of companies get wrong.

Alex Tinsley: They force it. They say, “We’re going to do this now. We’re going to work with these partners.”

Alex Tinsley: “But that’s not the partner that my customer cares about, so I’m not going to work with them. I’m going to work with this other partner. They’re just going to close the deal for me, and I’m going to give them one or two points instead of the 10 or 15 they should get.”

Alex Tinsley: There’s this very transactional view because of “stealing from me.” It’s the perception.

Alex Tinsley: Whenever a vendor says they want to do channel or they want to improve the channel, what they get wrong is the internal systems and processes and perception of the ecosystem. That needs to be the beginning. It needs to start there.

Alex Tinsley: We need to prioritize the perception, the processes and make everything about the partner so that they do what we all say they’re going to do. They’re going to scale our business. But we say that and then don’t back it up with the trust.

Alex Gluz: It’s a very interesting take on this, and it’s so true.

Alex Gluz: Also, I think you’ve been on the RevOps side. You see these things and you understand how this works more at certain levels of growth.

Alex Gluz: Yes, you have to give bigger percentages and the margin thing, but you’re also reaching some limits in your sales, and this gives you this bigger force out there, even though you’re sharing.

Alex Gluz: If you look at the big picture, it’s really valuable and it’s really letting you scale. That’s a great take on this and a really interesting question to discuss.

Marketing challenges, technology and education

Alex Gluz: What do you think are the biggest pain points for B2B SaaS and tech marketing leaders in 2025?

Alex Tinsley: Too much choice, too many things to try and do. One of the biggest things is internal tech stack and internal processes.

Alex Tinsley: I’ll go back to the basics. I’ll go back to the maniacal focus on excellent execution. If your marketers don’t understand how the tech stack works, then how are they going to use that tech stack to optimize the output for their input?

Alex Tinsley: Think about it simply: it’s a machine. Just like people say about calculators, they’re a machine. If you input the wrong numbers in the calculator, it’s going to give you the wrong numbers in the output.

Alex Tinsley: If you don’t understand how math works, even simply, then how would you know the output was wrong or is not as good as it could be?

Alex Tinsley: You don’t have to be a math wizard. But if you don’t understand simple algorithms of percentages, then you can’t even get close to the answer or knowing that the answer might be wrong.

Alex Tinsley: It’s the same way with your tech stack, the same way with your marketing process or your sales processes. If you don’t understand what it takes on an input to get the output you desire through the system, then when the output comes out, you don’t know if that’s as good as you can get or not.

Alex Tinsley: You just know either we missed or we didn’t miss. Then you’ve got to backtrack every little bit, trying to do forensics on it. Or you just start shoving more into the top and spending more money and wasting time, and then more output comes out.

Alex Tinsley: But you don’t know if it’s the best output or not until a salesperson, a very expensive resource, starts working it. Then you lose trust because they think it’s garbage.

Alex Gluz: The biggest pain points, and I talk to so many people, two themes always emerge. It’s AI disruptions in many different forms and also economic pressures.

Alex Gluz: Everything in general, the prices are going up. The cost to acquire a customer is higher. Buying traffic is higher. Going to events is higher. Nothing is cheaper. Let’s be real about this.

Alex Gluz: On top of that, what you mentioned is the shiny tool syndrome and all of this. The technology and things like that, we can’t stop this. It’s unstoppable. It’s not something you can control or stop in that way. But the biggest gap is in education.

Alex Gluz: Like you said, if you don’t understand the fundamentals, the basics. Yesterday I was reading somewhere in social media, which I try not to, except LinkedIn. It’s more or less okay if you follow certain people.

Alex Gluz: But it was like, “The ChatGPT, I have to correct it all the time.” You just don’t know how it works. You really don’t understand how it works.

Alex Gluz: What I’m saying, Alex, is even if you go to the biggest organization and you ask the smartest people there, “How does this thing work?” They’re like, “I know a little bit. I use it. A few things I know, but I don’t know a lot of it.”

Alex Gluz: It’s going to continue like that. Without proper education and being aligned also, because my understanding and your understanding could be completely different on certain things.

Alex Gluz: If we’re on the same page and have the same understanding of how things work, how it all aligns and the bigger goals, it’s there.

Alex Gluz: But the AI disruption is very real. It goes on different levels. It goes internally, like you said. Also, it goes externally because there’s so much noise. It’s a problem of how do you stand out, how do you differentiate yourself?

Alex Gluz: Again, we’re going back to the basics and really focusing on segmentation, clustering, understanding endpoints, the buyer journeys and really crafting the solutions, which are not temporary but long term.

Alex Gluz: Also, building the partnership system, like you said, and the channel system. That’s my little take on that.

Understanding AI tools before using them

Alex Tinsley: Absolutely. I just want to emphasize that there’s always been tools since the invention of the first tool, but you have to understand how the tool works in order for you to get the best outcomes from the tool.

Alex Tinsley: The tool can be a process. The tool can be AI. It can be other shiny objects.

Alex Tinsley: But if you don’t understand, one, what your goal is; two, how would you get your goal if you didn’t have these processes, if you didn’t have these tech stacks? Then start to get better by adding things in that help you get better and better.

Alex Tinsley: It goes back to the whole clustering and the segmentation. I think everything can be defined by this because once you get the basics and the desired outcomes absolutely rightly, executing excellently, then you can add more, and that’s how you scale again. It goes back to organic scale.

Alex Tinsley: But if you overcomplicate by using AI to use AI because everybody’s using AI, without understanding which AI platform or which AI tool or what the prompts are for each of these AIs, and how the algorithms are built or why they were built, what the outcomes of them are supposed to be for, then you’re going to get frustrated.

Alex Tinsley: You can’t go to an ATM and get a loan. Yes, it’s part of a bank. Yes, it’s something that knows what your numbers are. Yes, you know how much money you have. It might even have a little bit of other information.

Alex Tinsley: Some ATMs are now saying you can have investments in this and that or whatever, but you can’t ask it questions it doesn’t have information for.

Alex Tinsley: Understanding what the AI tools are or what any of the processes are, understanding what the outputs are, what the algorithms are designed for, what’s going into the algorithms, where it’s pulling information from, how you prompt.

Alex Tinsley: Asking better questions always gets better answers, and sometimes the better answer is, “I don’t know.” Great. Ask a different question. Ask a simpler question.

Alex Tinsley: Always verify, and make sure you’re getting what you actually are looking for.

Mentors, decision-making and closing remarks

Alex Gluz: What great advice. I have one last question for you, Alex. Who are your mentors and the best advice they gave you?

Alex Tinsley: I’ve had a lot of mentors. I look at people to share their perspective, whether or not I agree with it.

Alex Tinsley: I learn a lot from just ingesting people’s, whether they’re giving me information or they’re giving me other types of information called feedback, positive, negative or indifferent. I look at many different people as ways to grow.

Alex Tinsley: I’m continuously, and sometimes to my demise, very curious about how everything works and how people operate and just how we could be better humans. I apply that everywhere.

Alex Tinsley: The best mentors I ever had, I currently report to two. I have two bosses, and they both are completely different people but are very good mentors.

Alex Tinsley: One is a nonstop machine and just keeps moving forward, constantly moving forward and always ingesting information and working to get the better outcomes.

Alex Tinsley: The other mentor is more thoroughly thoughtful and intentionally slower in how and when they move.

Alex Tinsley: Both help me in the ways that I need to grow, where I can run really fast and keep going and not care and just keep ingesting and taking things. The other one is the exact opposite, where I don’t move because I don’t know if I want to do anything, so I just sit on it.

Alex Tinsley: Taking both of them and their mentorships and what information and things they guide will help.

Alex Tinsley: But the biggest piece of advice I’ve had was from a mentor I had a couple companies ago. She was probably, at this point in my life, the greatest mentor as far as what did I learn?

Alex Tinsley: The biggest thing I learned from her, and it may have been something somebody or my parents had always told me all my life, but I finally heard it when I got it from her.

Alex Tinsley: There was a decision that wasn’t being made. At this time, I was running a global team. I had people in five different countries around, and in all the continents, and teams of people.

Alex Tinsley: Something wasn’t being decided that was above me. I needed them to decide it, and they weren’t deciding it. I just said in my head, “What would happen if I just decided it and pushed it out anyway?”

Alex Tinsley: So I did. Immediately I was called by several different people and said, “You need to shut this thing down. You need to recall it. You need to do this.”

Alex Tinsley: I said, “Okay.” I did mea culpa, and I went on an apology tour and I recalled it. I did all this stuff, and everybody was so helpful. They were like, “Oh my gosh, sorry you went through this.”

Alex Tinsley: I had to apologize to so many different people.

Alex Tinsley: But my mentor, I called her and I said, “This is what happened. Oh my gosh, I’m sorry. I’ll do what it takes. This is what I did.”

Alex Tinsley: She just flat out said, “Did we lose a customer?”

Alex Tinsley: I said, “No. It had nothing to do with affecting any customers.”

Alex Tinsley: She said, “Don’t worry about it.”

Alex Tinsley: The reason why I say that is the biggest piece of advice or biggest nugget I got from any mentor translates to: you don’t have to always make the right decision because you never know what the right decision is at any given moment. But when you make a decision, no matter what, make that decision right.

Alex Tinsley: I made a decision in the moment because we needed to move forward and nobody was willing to take a chance. I took a chance. Some people thought it was the wrong decision, but I still stand by, I believe it was a decision that needed to be made.

Alex Tinsley: To make the decision right, I had to go on an apology tour, which gave me a voice to the people who weren’t making a decision. Guess what happened? It forced them to make a decision. Then we moved forward, and all it took was me saying, “I’m sorry.”

Alex Tinsley: That’s making the decision right. I made a decision I shouldn’t have, according to a lot of people. What I did is I said, “I’m sorry,” to make the decision right. Then people started working on it.

Alex Tinsley: Don’t be afraid to make decisions. Just make the decisions. You make those decisions right.

Alex Gluz: We’ve been talking to Alex Tinsley. Alex, where can people learn more about you? On LinkedIn?

Alex Tinsley: Alex Tinsley. I work at SUSE. I’ve worked at Red Hat, Riskified, Mattermost and a host of other companies. You can find me, chat with me. I’ll connect.

Alex Gluz: For our listeners, if you’d like to learn about how we can help you build marketing revenue engines that empower growth, visit tamonroe.com or contact me on LinkedIn as well.

Alex Gluz: All right, Alex, thanks so much.

Alex Tinsley: Thanks.

Metrics Mentioned

  • What it costs to get one dollar of revenue: his single framing for what revenue operations should optimize
  • Revenue per account executive: his worked example, 50 AEs against a million dollars, so $20,000 each, and 17 is a fail
  • Addressable market count: roughly 35,000 to 50,000 US mid-market companies, against 500 Fortune 500 companies delivering two-thirds of US GDP
  • Account coverage: 50 reps at 100 accounts each is 5,000 accounts, which he puts at 12.5% of the market
  • Intent signal tiers: three of three criteria, then two of three, then one of three, each with a different resource mix
  • Channel margin points: the one or two points a reluctant seller offers a partner against the 10 or 15 they should get
  • Mid-market definition: anywhere from $100 million to $1.5 billion in revenue, or 5,000 to 10,000 employees, depending on who is defining it

Tools and Channels Discussed

  • Field marketing reporting into the CRO: his own structure, and his recommendation for revenue operations too
  • Partner and channel ecosystems: Microsoft named as the model, for tiering partners to fill product gaps
  • Shared dashboards and analytics: his alternative to each team arguing from its own report
  • Cross-training and shadowing: the fix he actually used, sitting with marketing to watch the work
  • LinkedIn: the one social channel he still rates for professional reading
  • ChatGPT: Alex Gluz’s example of a tool people correct constantly without understanding how it works
  • Crossing the Chasm by Geoffrey A. Moore: the clustering argument, published in the nineties and raised on the episode

About the Guest

Alex Tinsley is Director of North America Field Marketing at SUSE, an enterprise open source software company. He has worked on both sides of the channel, at software vendors and at resellers, which is where his view on sales and marketing alignment comes from.

About the Host

Alex Gluz is the founder of T.A. Monroe Digital and host of the Revenue Engine Podcast. He has spent more than eight years building revenue engines for B2B SaaS companies and has run over 3,500 campaigns.

Resources Mentioned in this episode

  • T.A. Monroe Digital
  • Alex Gluz on LinkedIn
  • Alex Tinsley on LinkedIn
  • SUSE
  • Crossing the Chasm: The Updated Version of the Insightful Guide on Bringing Cutting-Edge Products to the Mainstream by Geoffrey A. Moore

Where we land on this

When a client tells us the leads are bad, we ask to see the rejection reasons before we look at anything else. Roughly half the time there are none recorded, which means the complaint has never been specific enough to act on, and both teams have been arguing about a feeling for a year.

Our position is that the MQL definition belongs to sales and the maintenance of it belongs to marketing. Sales decides what counts, because they meet the accounts. Marketing keeps it current, because they see the market move first. A definition owned by one function is a definition the other will ignore.

We build the demand generation programs that feed a definition both teams agreed on, for B2B SaaS companies. See how we work.

273% more qualified leads, from changing who counted

Preset was generating plenty of leads, and sales was not working most of them. We rebuilt the LinkedIn Ads targeting around the accounts that had actually closed, and qualified lead volume rose 273%. The definition changed before the campaigns did.

MQL to SQL conversion rate in practice: the Preset case study
Read the Preset Case Study

Common Questions About MQLs and SQLs

What is a qualified B2B lead?

One that matches your ideal customer profile and has shown intent to solve the problem you sell into. Engagement alone is not qualification: content downloads and webinar attendance show interest, not intent. The practical test is whether sales would take the meeting if they saw the record before the score.

What is the difference between an MQL and an SQL?

An MQL has met marketing’s bar, normally fit plus engagement. An SQL has met sales’ bar, which adds a stated need, a timeline, and access to a decision maker. The handoff between them is where most B2B pipeline is lost, and it is lost because the two bars were set separately.

What is a good MQL to SQL conversion rate?

B2B SaaS averages 18% to 22%, with top performers at 25% to 35%, and companies scoring on firmographic fit as well as behavior reaching 39% to 40%. Enterprise-focused companies run lower, at 10% to 18%, because the deals are bigger and the qualification bar is higher.

Why does sales say our leads are bad?

Usually because marketing is scoring engagement and sales is judging fit, so both are right about different populations. Before changing anything, pull the last fifty rejected leads and read the reasons. If there are no recorded reasons, that is the finding.

Should we get rid of MQLs entirely?

Only if you are replacing the boundary with a better one, not removing it. Some teams move to opportunity-based or account-based handoffs successfully. Teams that simply delete the MQL stage without agreeing what replaces it end up with the same argument conducted in different vocabulary.

Who should own the MQL definition, sales or marketing?

Sales should own what counts, because they meet the accounts. Marketing should own keeping it current, because they see the market move first. Give both to one function, and the other will ignore it.

How often should the definition be reviewed?

Quarterly as a default, and immediately whenever the conversion rate moves more than a few points, the ICP changes, or a new segment opens. Agree on the trigger in advance so the review is a scheduled task rather than a negotiation that happens after an argument.

Related Episodes

  • How Do You Define an Ideal Customer Profile for B2B SaaS? With Nick Naso: the fit half of the definition, with Recurly’s former CRO.
  • Why Are Our B2B SaaS Leads Not Converting? With Bethany Prettyman: what happens to the funnel after the handoff.

Fifteen minutes on your definition, with both teams’ numbers

Bring your MQL criteria and your last quarter’s rejection reasons. We will tell you which of the two bars is doing the damage and what the rate should look like at your deal size. No pitch attached.

Book a 15-minute call

Marketing a SaaS product?

See how we plan paid campaigns around trials, demos and the customers who stay.

Explore SaaS Marketing

Share this post

Featured Posts

View
Podcast
October 16, 2026

Building a Data-Driven Marketing Engine for SaaS Success With Alex Schutte

Learn how to build a data-driven SaaS marketing strategy that attracts high-value customers and drives sustainable growth. Hubstaff's Alex Schutte shares insights on optimizing paid acquisition, improving lead quality, leveraging customer lifetime value, and aligning marketing with product development while balancing AI automation with human creativity.

View
Podcast
View
Video
October 12, 2026

Workshop: How AI, Buyer Signals & Relevance Are Reshaping B2B SaaS Revenue With Eric Quanstrom

Eric Quanstrom, VP of GTM Engineering at Apollo.io, joins Alex Gluz to explore why easier outbound has made buyer attention harder to win. The takeaway: signal-based selling and relevance beat volume, and AI should tee up more human sales conversations rather than replace them.

View
Video
View
Podcast
October 2, 2026

Sales Efficiency in the AI Era With Eric Quanstrom

In this episode of the Revenue Engine Podcast, Alex Gluz chats with Noah Fitzgerald, Chief Revenue Officer at Qredible, about leadership, growth, and building businesses that matter. Noah shares insights on founder challenges, customer-driven growth, and AI’s impact on business. He also discusses personal development, entrepreneurship, and lessons from building multiple ventures.

View
Podcast
15-minute strategy call

Most Agencies Promise ROI. We Prove It.

Book a Call

More Posts

View
Podcast
October 16, 2026

Building a Data-Driven Marketing Engine for SaaS Success With Alex Schutte

Learn how to build a data-driven SaaS marketing strategy that attracts high-value customers and drives sustainable growth. Hubstaff's Alex Schutte shares insights on optimizing paid acquisition, improving lead quality, leveraging customer lifetime value, and aligning marketing with product development while balancing AI automation with human creativity.

View
Podcast
View
Video
October 12, 2026

Workshop: How AI, Buyer Signals & Relevance Are Reshaping B2B SaaS Revenue With Eric Quanstrom

Eric Quanstrom, VP of GTM Engineering at Apollo.io, joins Alex Gluz to explore why easier outbound has made buyer attention harder to win. The takeaway: signal-based selling and relevance beat volume, and AI should tee up more human sales conversations rather than replace them.

View
Video
View
Podcast
October 2, 2026

Sales Efficiency in the AI Era With Eric Quanstrom

In this episode of the Revenue Engine Podcast, Alex Gluz chats with Noah Fitzgerald, Chief Revenue Officer at Qredible, about leadership, growth, and building businesses that matter. Noah shares insights on founder challenges, customer-driven growth, and AI’s impact on business. He also discusses personal development, entrepreneurship, and lessons from building multiple ventures.

View
Podcast
View
Articles
September 28, 2026

Building a B2B SaaS ICP That Paid Media Can Actually Target

A step-by-step framework for turning a vague B2B SaaS buyer persona into five targetable ICP inputs, mapped directly to LinkedIn and Google Ads targeting fields, with a fintech-specific breakdown included.

View
Articles
View
Podcast
September 18, 2026

The Human Side of Growth: Leadership and Building What Matters

In this episode of the Revenue Engine Podcast, Alex Gluz chats with Noah Fitzgerald, Chief Revenue Officer at Qredible, about leadership, growth, and building businesses that matter. Noah shares insights on founder challenges, customer-driven growth, and AI’s impact on business. He also discusses personal development, entrepreneurship, and lessons from building multiple ventures.

View
Podcast
View
Articles
September 15, 2026

Google Ads vs LinkedIn Ads for B2B SaaS: Which Deserves the Next Dollar

Choosing a B2B SaaS agency or an in-house paid media hire is an 18-month cost question. See both sides of the model, with every assumption visible.

View
Articles
View
Articles
September 15, 2026

Agency vs In‑House for B2B SaaS Paid Growth: The Real 18-Month Cost Model

Choosing a B2B SaaS agency or an in-house paid media hire is an 18-month cost question. See both sides of the model, with every assumption visible.

View
Articles
View
Podcast
September 4, 2026

How To Create a Category and Disrupt an Existing Market With Steve Keifer

Learn how a category creation strategy builds market awareness, earns buyer trust, and helps B2B companies disrupt entrenched competitors effectively.

View
Podcast
View
Video
August 26, 2026

Workshop: How Domain Names Are Being Redefined for the Next Era of the Internet

Identity Digital CRO Matt Overman joins Alex Gluz to unpack what hundreds of millions of domain registrations reveal about digital identity and the agentic web. The takeaway: domains are becoming sovereign identity anchors for humans and AI agents, and legacy .com gravity is giving way to meaningful, purpose-built extensions.

View
Video
View
Podcast
August 21, 2026

Modern Go-to-Market Leadership in the Age of AI With Eric Gilpin

Learn how AI go-to-market strategy helps SaaS teams adapt to buyer behavior, prove ROI, grow accounts, and build stronger customer relationships.

View
Podcast
View
Podcast
August 7, 2026

How B2B Brands Can Stand Out in a Crowded Market With Amanda Dyson

Learn how B2B brands can differentiate with a bold point of view, authentic content, strategic AI use, and marketing tied directly to pipeline.

View
Podcast
View
Articles
July 27, 2026

The Ultimate B2B SaaS Demand Generation Playbook for 2026: Building Sustainable Growth Through Brand, Product, and Community

Gain actionable insights and access to practical tools designed to build a robust and sustainable demand engine that will thrive in 2026 and beyond.

View
Articles
See all posts

More Resources

B2B SaaS Persona Builder

A copy-and-paste prompt for ChatGPT.

Download Now

The B2B SaaS Paid Growth Benchmarks Report 2027

The benchmarks B2B SaaS leaders use to see what a dollar of paid growth actually buys. Revenue-level data across three channels, plus a FinTech deep dive.

Download Now

5 Must-Know 2026 B2B Marketing Trends

Five trends shaping B2B SaaS pipeline generation in 2026, and the one move to make on each. A fast way to check your current strategy against what's actually working now.

Download Now

2026 AI Buyer Effect Field Guide

Buyers ask an AI tool instead of clicking through your funnel. This guide shows where that shows up first in your account, and what to do about it.

Download Now

LinkedIn Targeting Cheat Sheet

Four targeting layers, three ABM moves, and a 48-hour launch timeline. One page, actionable today.

Download Now

The Competitor Teardown Skill

Point it at any competitor URL. Get their positioning gaps, the buyers they've written off, and the one line that wins the deal.

Download Now

2026 Reddit Prelaunch Targeting Guide

No wasted spend, no setup surprises. Get your Reddit targeting right before you go live.

Download Now

2026 B2B Marketing Trends Report

What leading B2B marketers are prioritizing in 2026. The trends, data, and tactics to sharpen your strategy.

Download Now

AI Marketing Strategies Playbook: How 5 Marketing Leaders Cracked the AI Code

How 5 Marketing Leaders Cracked the AI Code.

Download Now

Google Search Ads Benchmarks Report

Learn why your search ads cost more and convert less (and what to do about it).

Download Now

B2B SaaS LinkedIn Targeting Blueprint

How to drive qualified leads in under 7 days using LinkedIn’s targeting capabilities (including account-based marketing).

Download Now

LinkedIn Ads Benchmarks Report 2026

The 2026 LinkedIn benchmarks B2B marketing teams use to lower CPLs and protect budget. Format-level data across four formats, two regions, and three industries.

Download Now

Explore Proven Formulas for High‑Impact LinkedIn Ads

LinkedIn Ads Swipe File.

Download Now

Creating a Complete Full-Funnel Strategy for Predictable Revenue Growth

Download Now

How to Stop Overpaying for Your Branded Google Ads Keywords

The Ultimate Branded Google Ads Optimization Guide.

Download Now

The 2026 Ultimate Revenue Engine Blueprint

Your guide to standing out in crowded markets without overspending on ads. Covers branding, PLG triggers, and community tactics in one concise playbook.

Download Now

5 Tips To Find Success on Google Ads

Download Now

7 High-ROI Google Ads Optimization Tips & Strategies + Bonus Checklist

Download Now

Improve Your MQL Quality in 90 Days Cheat Sheet

In this cheat sheet, you’ll learn the top hacks to get more marketing‑qualified leads for your sales funnel.

Download Now

4 Secrets for Running Paid Social Ads That You’re Not Supposed to Know

Download Now

Discover the 7 Essential Steps for an Effective Go-to-Market Strategy

Download Now

B2B SaaS Revenue Growth Checklist

If your revenue engine falls short of expectations, this checklist will help you quickly identify and address the underlying issues.

Download Now
See all free resources
Revenue Engine Newsletter

Get B2B Marketing & Growth Insights

Our SaaS-focused frameworks help you scale qualified pipeline and accelerate revenue growth.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
T.A. Monroe logo, white version
Google Premier Partner 2026
Address:
7284 West Palmetto Park Road, Suite 101, Boca Raton, Fl 33433
Contact:
+1 (646) 844-9480
support@tamonroe.com
ServicesCase StudiesAbout UsCareersContact
Resource HubPodcastArticlesVideoLibrary
Copyright © 2026 – T.A. Monroe Digital Agency
Privacy Policy